ADSL拨号VPS包含了中国大陆（联通，移动，电信，）

中国香港，国外拨号VPS。

mysql> show engine innodb status\G*** (1) TRANSACTION:TRANSACTION 102973, ACTIVE 11 sec starting index readmysql tables in use 3, locked 3LOCK WAIT 4 lock struct(s), heap size 1136, 3 row lock(s)MySQL thread id 6, OS thread handle 140024996574976, query id 83 localhost us updatingUPDATE TestTableSET column1 = 1,Column2 = sysdate(),Column3= '026'Column4 = 0AND column5 = 485AND column6 = 'SEK'*** (1) WAITING FOR THIS LOCK TO BE GRANTED:RECORD LOCKS space id 417 page no 1493 n bits 1000 index idx_column6 of table test.TestTable trx id 102973 lock_mode X waitingRecord lock, heap no 859 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 2; compact format; info bits 00: len 3; hex 53454b; asc SEK;;1: len 8; hex 80000000007e1452; asc ~ R;;*** (2) TRANSACTION:TRANSACTION 102972, ACTIVE 26 sec starting index readmysql tables in use 3, locked 3219 lock struct(s), heap size 24784, 2906 row lock(s), undo log entries 7MySQL thread id 5, OS thread handle 140024996841216, query id 84 localhost us updatingUPDATE TestTableSET Column1 = 1,Column2 = sysdate(),Column3 = '026'Column4 = 0AND Column5 = 485AND Column6 = 'SEK'*** (2) HOLDS THE LOCK(S):RECORD LOCKS space id 417 page no 1493 n bits 1000 index idx_Column6 of table test.TestTable trx id 102972 lock_mode XRecord lock, heap no 1 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 1; compact format; info bits 00: len 8; hex 73757072656d756d; asc supremum;;Record lock, heap no 859 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 2; compact format; info bits 00: len 3; hex 53454b; asc SEK;;1: len 8; hex 80000000007e1452; asc ~ R;;

*** (2) WAITING FOR THIS LOCK TO BE GRANTED:RECORD LOCKS space id 601 page no 89642 n bits 1000 index idx_column6 of table test.TestTable trx id 32231892482 lock_mode X locks rec but not gap waitingRecord lock, heap no 38 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 2; compact format; info bits 00: len 3; hex 53454b; asc SEK;;1: len 8; hex 80000000007eea14; asc ~ ;;

大致一看，更新同一索引的同一行，应该是一个Block，报TimeOut的错才对，怎么会报DeadLock?

【初步分析】

先分析下(2) TRANSACTION，TRANSACTION 32231892482。

等待的锁信息为：

0: len 3; hex 53454b; asc SEK;;1: len 8; hex 80000000007eea14; asc

持有的锁信息为：

0: len 3; hex 53454b; asc SEK;;1: len 8; hex 80000000007eeac4; asc

再先分析下(1) TRANSACTION，TRANSACTION 32231892617。

等待的锁信息为：

0: len 3; hex 53454b; asc SEK;;1: len 8; hex 80000000007eeac4; asc

于是可以画出的死锁表，两个资源相互依赖，造成死锁：

TRANSACTION Hold Wait 32231892617 53454b\80000000007eea14 53454b\80000000007eeac4 32231892482 53454b\80000000007eeac4 53454b\80000000007eea14

让我们再看一下explain结果：

mysql>desc UPDATE TestTable SET Column1=1, Column2 = sysdate(),Column3 = '025' Column4 = 0 AND Column5 = 477 AND Column6 = 'SEK' \G;
*************************** 1. row ***************************
id: 1
select_type: UPDATE
table: TestTable
partitions: NULL
type: index_merge
possible_keys: column5_index,idx_column5_column6_Column1,idxColumn6
key: column5_index,idxColumn6
key_len: 8,9
ref: NULL
rows: 7
filtered: 100.00
Extra: Using intersect(column5_index,idxColumn6); Using where

可以看到 EXTRA 列：

Using intersect(column5_index,idxColumn6)

从5.1开始，引入了 index merge 优化技术，对同一个表可以使用多个索引分别进行条件扫描。

相关文档：http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.7/en/index-merge-optimization.html

The Index Merge method is used to retrieve rows with several range scans and to merge their results into one. The merge can produce unions, intersections, or unions-of-intersections of its underlying scans. This access method merges index scans from a single table; it does not merge scans across multiple tables.

【模拟与验证】

根据以上初步分析，猜测应该就是intersect造成的，于是在测试环境模拟验证，开启2个session模拟死锁：

时间序列 Session1 Session2 1 Begin； 2 UPDATE TestTable SET Column2 = sysdate() Column4 = 0 AND Column5 = 47 AND Column6 = 'SEK
执行成功，影响7行 3 Begin； 4 UPDATE TestTable SET Column2 = sysdate(),Column4 = 0 AND Column5 = 485 AND Column6 = 'SEK'；
被Blocking 5 UPDATE TestTable SET Column2 = sysdate(),Column4 = 0 AND Column5 = 485 AND Column6 = 'SEK'；
执行成功 ERROR 1213 (40001): Deadlock found when trying to get lock; try restarting transaction

依据以上信息可以发现Session2虽然被Block了，但也获取了一些Session1在时间序列5时所需资源的X锁，可以再开启一个查询select count(Column5) from TestTable where Column5 = 485，设置SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL SERIALIZABLE，去查询Column5 = 485的行，观察锁等待的信息：
mysql> SELECT r.trx_id waiting_trx_id, r.trx_mysql_thread_id waiting_thread, r.trx_query waiting_query, b.trx_id

mysql> SELECT r.trx_id waiting_trx_id, r.trx_mysql_thread_id waiting_thread, r.trx_query waiting_query, b.trx_id blocking_trx_id, b.trx_mysql_thread_id blocking_thread, b.trx_query blocking_query FROM information_schema.innodb_lock_waits w INNER JOIN information_schema.innodb_trx b ON b.trx_id = w.blocking_trx_id INNER JOIN information_schema.innodb_trx r ON r.trx_id = w.requesting_trx_id \G;*************************** 1. row ***************************waiting_trx_id: 103006waiting_thread: 36waiting_query: UPDATE TestTable SET Column1 = 1, Column2 = sysdate(), Column3 = '026' Column4 = 0 AND Column5 = 485 AND Column6 = 'SEK'blocking_trx_id: 103003blocking_thread: 37blocking_query: NULL*************************** 2. row ***************************waiting_trx_id: 421500433538672waiting_thread: 39waiting_query: select count(Column5) from TestTable where Column5 = 485blocking_trx_id: 103006blocking_thread: 36blocking_query: UPDATE TestTable SET Column1 = 1, Column2 = sysdate(), Column3 = '026' Column4 = 0 AND Column5 = 485 AND Column6 = 'SEK'2 rows in set, 1 warning (0.00 sec)mysql> select * from information_schema.innodb_lock_waits \G;*************************** 1. row ***************************requesting_trx_id: 103006requested_lock_id: 103006:417:1493:859blocking_trx_id: 103003blocking_lock_id: 103003:417:1493:859*************************** 2. row ***************************requesting_trx_id: 421500433538672requested_lock_id: 421500433538672:417:749:2blocking_trx_id: 103006blocking_lock_id: 103006:417:749:22 rows in set, 1 warning (0.00 sec)

mysql> select * from INNODB_LOCKS \G;*************************** 1. row ***************************lock_id: 103006:417:1493:859lock_trx_id: 103006lock_mode: Xlock_type: RECORDlock_table: test.TestTablelock_index: idxColumn6lock_space: 417lock_page: 1493lock_rec: 859lock_data: 'SEK', 8262738*************************** 2. row ***************************lock_id: 103003:417:1493:859lock_trx_id: 103003lock_mode: Xlock_type: RECORDlock_table:test.TestTablelock_index: idxColumn6lock_space: 417lock_page: 1493lock_rec: 859lock_data: 'SEK', 8262738*************************** 3. row ***************************lock_id: 421500433538672:417:749:2lock_trx_id: 421500433538672lock_mode: Slock_type: RECORDlock_table: test.TestTablelock_index: column5_indexlock_space: 417lock_page: 749lock_rec: 2lock_data: 485, 8317620*************************** 4. row ***************************lock_id: 103006:417:749:2lock_trx_id: 103006lock_mode: Xlock_type: RECORDlock_table: test.TestTablelock_index: column5_indexlock_space: 417lock_page: 749lock_rec: 2lock_data: 485, 83176204 rows in set, 1 warning (0.00 sec)

可以看到Session2，trx_id 103006阻塞了trx_id 421500433538672，而trx_id 421500433538672 requested_lock也正好是lock_data: 485, 8317620。由此可见Session2虽然别block了，但是还是获取到了Index column5_index相关的锁。被Block是因为intersect的原因，还需要idxColumn6的锁，至此思路已经清晰，对整个分配锁的信息简化一下，如下表格（请求到的锁用青色表示，需获取但未获取到的锁用红色表示）：

时间点 Session1 Session2 1 477 SEK 2 485SEK 3 485SEK 死锁发生

可以看到485 SEK这两个资源形成了一个环状，最终发生死锁。

【解决方法】

最佳的方法是添加column5和Column6的联合索引。我们环境当时的情况发现Column6的筛选度非常低，就删除了Column6的索引。
10:55左右删除索引后，报错没有再发生：

总结

以上就是这篇文章的全部内容了，希望本文的内容对大家的学习或者工作具有一定的参考学习价值，如果有疑问大家可以留言交流，谢谢大家对脚本之家的支持。

(责任编辑：admin)